rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing. #131908
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @GuillaumeGomez. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. cc @GuillaumeGomez, @jsha |
Noratrieb
reviewed
Oct 18, 2024
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-gamer-hashing
branch
from
9393a0e to
3c74054
Compare
notriddle
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
notriddle
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2024
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-gamer-hashing
branch
from
3c74054 to
3cf8a61
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2024
|
Just realised the same thing a few seconds ago. Thanks a lot! r=me once CI pass |
|
@bors r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…g, r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing. Fixes rust-lang#129533 (comment) fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in rust-lang#129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127462 (std: uefi: Add basic Env variables) - rust-lang#131537 (Fix range misleading field access) - rust-lang#131838 (bootstrap: allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml) - rust-lang#131871 (x86-32 float return for 'Rust' ABI: treat all float types consistently) - rust-lang#131876 (compiler: Use LLVM's Comdat support) - rust-lang#131890 (Update `use` keyword docs to describe precise capturing) - rust-lang#131899 (Mark unexpected variant res suggestion as having placeholders) - rust-lang#131908 (rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…g, r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing. Fixes rust-lang#129533 (comment) fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in rust-lang#129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127462 (std: uefi: Add basic Env variables) - rust-lang#131537 (Fix range misleading field access) - rust-lang#131838 (bootstrap: allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml) - rust-lang#131871 (x86-32 float return for 'Rust' ABI: treat all float types consistently) - rust-lang#131876 (compiler: Use LLVM's Comdat support) - rust-lang#131890 (Update `use` keyword docs to describe precise capturing) - rust-lang#131899 (Mark unexpected variant res suggestion as having placeholders) - rust-lang#131908 (rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing.) - rust-lang#131916 (small interpreter error cleanup) - rust-lang#131919 (zero-sized accesses are fine on null pointers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…g, r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing. Fixes rust-lang#129533 (comment) fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in rust-lang#129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127462 (std: uefi: Add basic Env variables) - rust-lang#131537 (Fix range misleading field access) - rust-lang#131838 (bootstrap: allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml) - rust-lang#131871 (x86-32 float return for 'Rust' ABI: treat all float types consistently) - rust-lang#131890 (Update `use` keyword docs to describe precise capturing) - rust-lang#131899 (Mark unexpected variant res suggestion as having placeholders) - rust-lang#131908 (rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing.) - rust-lang#131916 (small interpreter error cleanup) - rust-lang#131919 (zero-sized accesses are fine on null pointers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127462 (std: uefi: Add basic Env variables) - rust-lang#131537 (Fix range misleading field access) - rust-lang#131838 (bootstrap: allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml) - rust-lang#131890 (Update `use` keyword docs to describe precise capturing) - rust-lang#131899 (Mark unexpected variant res suggestion as having placeholders) - rust-lang#131908 (rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing.) - rust-lang#131916 (small interpreter error cleanup) - rust-lang#131919 (zero-sized accesses are fine on null pointers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#131908 - aDotInTheVoid:rustdoc-gamer-hashing, r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing. Fixes rust-lang#129533 (comment) fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in rust-lang#129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #129533 (comment)
fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in #129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.