Skip to content

Do not emit missing_doc_code_examples rustdoc lint on module and a few other items #133595

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 1, 2024

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

It doesn't make sense to expect modules to have code examples. Same goes for:

  • Trait aliases
  • Foreign items
  • Associated types and constants

Should make the use of this lint a bit nicer.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 28, 2024
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Can we add some notes to the Rustdoc Book to document how we decide which things to require examples on and which ones to not?

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

The section in the rustdoc book is a bit empty (to say the least). Gonna extend it and also include why some items don't have this "requirement".

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Added a list of items which do not trigger the lint.

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Sweet.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 30, 2024

📌 Commit b118d05 has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 30, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2024
…amples, r=notriddle

Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items

It doesn't make sense to expect modules to have code examples. Same goes for:

 * Trait aliases
 * Foreign items
 * Associated types and constants

Should make the use of this lint a bit nicer.

r? `@notriddle`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128004 (codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm)
 - rust-lang#132974 (Properly pass linker arguments that contain commas)
 - rust-lang#133403 (Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`)
 - rust-lang#133482 (Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+)
 - rust-lang#133595 (Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items)
 - rust-lang#133669 (Move some functions out of const_swap feature gate)
 - rust-lang#133674 (Fix chaining `carrying_add`s)
 - rust-lang#133691 (Check let source before suggesting annotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132974 (Properly pass linker arguments that contain commas)
 - rust-lang#133403 (Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`)
 - rust-lang#133482 (Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+)
 - rust-lang#133595 (Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items)
 - rust-lang#133669 (Move some functions out of const_swap feature gate)
 - rust-lang#133674 (Fix chaining `carrying_add`s)
 - rust-lang#133691 (Check let source before suggesting annotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132974 (Properly pass linker arguments that contain commas)
 - rust-lang#133403 (Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`)
 - rust-lang#133482 (Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+)
 - rust-lang#133595 (Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items)
 - rust-lang#133669 (Move some functions out of const_swap feature gate)
 - rust-lang#133674 (Fix chaining `carrying_add`s)
 - rust-lang#133691 (Check let source before suggesting annotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2713dc2 into rust-lang:master Dec 1, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 1, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133595 - GuillaumeGomez:missing_doc_code_examples, r=notriddle

Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items

It doesn't make sense to expect modules to have code examples. Same goes for:

 * Trait aliases
 * Foreign items
 * Associated types and constants

Should make the use of this lint a bit nicer.

r? ``@notriddle``
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the missing_doc_code_examples branch December 1, 2024 22:33
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants