Skip to content

suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method #134154

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

oriongonza
Copy link
Contributor

@oriongonza oriongonza commented Dec 10, 2024

Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without ()

r? estebank
Fixes #67680

Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 10, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address the nits, then I can approve.

And also fix the test file to not mention "issue". It's redundant -- leave a comment inside saying // Regression test for <...> if you want.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Also please give this a more descriptive error message. This is approximately the most generic message that could exist currently 😆

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Whoops I misspoke in the last comment--I meant that this needs a better PR title :)

@oriongonza
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh I was actually changing the error message :P

@oriongonza oriongonza changed the title Fix confusing error message suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method Dec 11, 2024
@oriongonza
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now that I'm on it, do you think that
"attempted to access {field}on type{expr_t} as a field when it's a method",
is better than
"attempted to access field {field}on type{expr_t}",
?

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I think the error message is fine as-is

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2024

📌 Commit 014363e has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 11, 2024
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…mpiler-errors

suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method

Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without `()`

r? estebank
Fixes rust-lang#67680

Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122003 (link libunwind dynamically and allow controlling it via `crt-static` on gnullvm targets)
 - rust-lang#133122 (Add unpolished, experimental support for AFIDT (async fn in dyn trait))
 - rust-lang#133859 (Move some alloc tests to the alloctests crate)
 - rust-lang#134070 (Some asm! diagnostic adjustments and a papercut fix)
 - rust-lang#134095 ([CI] Use a lockfile for installing the `datadog` package)
 - rust-lang#134144 (Properly consider APITs for never type fallback ascription fix)
 - rust-lang#134152 (Simplify `rustc_mir_dataflow::abs_domain`.)
 - rust-lang#134154 (suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method)
 - rust-lang#134155 (Forbid `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` for Hurd)
 - rust-lang#134173 (allow `symbol_intern_string_literal` lint in test modules)
 - rust-lang#134178 (Stabilize the Rust 2024 prelude)
 - rust-lang#134179 (Remove outdated consteval note from `<*mut T>::align_offset` docs.)
 - rust-lang#134187 (Remove `PErr`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122003 (link libunwind dynamically and allow controlling it via `crt-static` on gnullvm targets)
 - rust-lang#133859 (Move some alloc tests to the alloctests crate)
 - rust-lang#134070 (Some asm! diagnostic adjustments and a papercut fix)
 - rust-lang#134144 (Properly consider APITs for never type fallback ascription fix)
 - rust-lang#134152 (Simplify `rustc_mir_dataflow::abs_domain`.)
 - rust-lang#134154 (suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method)
 - rust-lang#134155 (Forbid `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` for Hurd)
 - rust-lang#134173 (allow `symbol_intern_string_literal` lint in test modules)
 - rust-lang#134178 (Stabilize the Rust 2024 prelude)
 - rust-lang#134179 (Remove outdated consteval note from `<*mut T>::align_offset` docs.)
 - rust-lang#134187 (Remove `PErr`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1d78422 into rust-lang:master Dec 12, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134154 - dev-ardi:field-expr-generics, r=compiler-errors

suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method

Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without `()`

r? estebank
Fixes rust-lang#67680

Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Confusing hint on missing parentheses after collect<>
6 participants