Skip to content

rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax &mut raw const #134244

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Dec 13, 2024

A legitimate suggestion would be to change from

&raw const val

to

&raw mut val

But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least
stop suggesting invalid syntax.

I recommend review commit-by-commit.

Part of #127562

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 13, 2024

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I left some feedback, but looks good otherwise.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 13, 2024
So that it becomes easy for a later commit to return `None`.
The test fails in this commit. The next commit fixes it.
A legitimate suggestion would be to change from

    &raw const val

to

    &raw mut val

But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least
stop suggesting invalid syntax.
@Enselic Enselic force-pushed the no-mut-hint-for-raw-ref branch from f1baf80 to f6cb227 Compare December 13, 2024 15:38
@Enselic Enselic changed the title rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting invalid syntax &mut raw const rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax &mut raw const Dec 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 13, 2024

📌 Commit f6cb227 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 13, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
…=jieyouxu

rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const`

A legitimate suggestion would be to change from

    &raw const val

to

    &raw mut val

But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least
stop suggesting invalid syntax.

I recommend review commit-by-commit.

Part of rust-lang#127562
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
…=jieyouxu

rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const`

A legitimate suggestion would be to change from

    &raw const val

to

    &raw mut val

But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least
stop suggesting invalid syntax.

I recommend review commit-by-commit.

Part of rust-lang#127562
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134181 (Tweak multispan rendering to reduce output length)
 - rust-lang#134209 (validate `--skip` and `--exclude` paths)
 - rust-lang#134231 (rustdoc-search: fix mismatched path when parent re-exported twice)
 - rust-lang#134236 (crashes: more tests v2)
 - rust-lang#134240 (Only dist `llvm-objcopy` if llvm tools are enabled)
 - rust-lang#134244 (rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const`)
 - rust-lang#134251 (A bunch of cleanups (part 2))
 - rust-lang#134256 (Use a more precise span in placeholder_type_error_diag)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 34e6075 into rust-lang:master Dec 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 14, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134244 - Enselic:no-mut-hint-for-raw-ref, r=jieyouxu

rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const`

A legitimate suggestion would be to change from

    &raw const val

to

    &raw mut val

But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least
stop suggesting invalid syntax.

I recommend review commit-by-commit.

Part of rust-lang#127562
@Enselic Enselic deleted the no-mut-hint-for-raw-ref branch December 14, 2024 09:12
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
rustc_borrowck: Suggest changing `&raw const` to `&raw mut` if applicable

Closes rust-lang#127562

For reference, here is the diff compared to the original error reported in that issue before rust-lang#134244 stopped suggesting the invalid syntax:

```
diff --git a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
index 0da5d15..dbe834b 100644
--- a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
+++ b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
`@@` -6,8 +6,8 `@@` LL |     unsafe { *ptr = 3; }
    |
 help: consider changing this to be a mutable pointer
    |
-LL |     let ptr = &mut raw const val;
-   |                +++
+LL |     let ptr = &raw mut val;
+   |                    ~~~

 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
```
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
rustc_borrowck: Suggest changing `&raw const` to `&raw mut` if applicable

Closes rust-lang#127562

For reference, here is the diff compared to the original error reported in that issue before rust-lang#134244 stopped suggesting the invalid syntax:

```
diff --git a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
index 0da5d15..dbe834b 100644
--- a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
+++ b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
``@@`` -6,8 +6,8 ``@@`` LL |     unsafe { *ptr = 3; }
    |
 help: consider changing this to be a mutable pointer
    |
-LL |     let ptr = &mut raw const val;
-   |                +++
+LL |     let ptr = &raw mut val;
+   |                    ~~~

 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
```
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134397 - Enselic:raw-mut, r=compiler-errors

rustc_borrowck: Suggest changing `&raw const` to `&raw mut` if applicable

Closes rust-lang#127562

For reference, here is the diff compared to the original error reported in that issue before rust-lang#134244 stopped suggesting the invalid syntax:

```
diff --git a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
index 0da5d15..dbe834b 100644
--- a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
+++ b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr
``@@`` -6,8 +6,8 ``@@`` LL |     unsafe { *ptr = 3; }
    |
 help: consider changing this to be a mutable pointer
    |
-LL |     let ptr = &mut raw const val;
-   |                +++
+LL |     let ptr = &raw mut val;
+   |                    ~~~

 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
```
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants