Skip to content

Implement pattern type ffi checks #136193

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Jan 28, 2025

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for NonZero and NonNull after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 28, 2025

r? @chenyukang

rustbot has assigned @chenyukang.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 28, 2025
@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the pattern-type-ffi-checks branch from 784bbfa to 937866a Compare January 29, 2025 16:37
@chenyukang
Copy link
Member

@bors r=chenyukang

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 5, 2025

📌 Commit 937866a has been approved by chenyukang

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 5, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Feb 5, 2025

@bors rollup

jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
…=chenyukang

Implement pattern type ffi checks

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for `NonZero` and `NonNull` after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Feb 5, 2025

Seems to have failed in rollup, I think it's this PR?

error[E0599]: no method named `try_to_bits` found for struct `rustc_middle::ty::Const` in the current scope
   --> compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs:878:35
    |
878 | ...                   start.try_to_bits(tcx, typing_env).is_some_and(|i| i > 0)
    |                             ^^^^^^^^^^^ method not found in `Const<'_>`

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 5, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu closed this Feb 5, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu reopened this Feb 5, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the pattern-type-ffi-checks branch from 937866a to 60ed9db Compare February 5, 2025 11:20
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Feb 5, 2025

@bors r=chenyukang

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 5, 2025

📌 Commit 60ed9db has been approved by chenyukang

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 5, 2025
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup=maybe

workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
…=chenyukang

Implement pattern type ffi checks

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for `NonZero` and `NonNull` after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135439 (Make `-O` mean `OptLevel::Aggressive`)
 - rust-lang#136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
 - rust-lang#136235 (Pretty print pattern type values with transmute if they don't satisfy their pattern)
 - rust-lang#136311 (Ensure that we never try to monomorphize the upcasting or vtable calls of impossible dyn types)
 - rust-lang#136315 (Use short ty string for binop and unop errors)
 - rust-lang#136393 (Fix accidentally not emitting overflowing literals lints anymore in patterns)
 - rust-lang#136530 (Implement `x perf` directly in bootstrap)
 - rust-lang#136580 (Couple of changes to run rustc in miri)
 - rust-lang#136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135439 (Make `-O` mean `OptLevel::Aggressive`)
 - rust-lang#136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
 - rust-lang#136235 (Pretty print pattern type values with transmute if they don't satisfy their pattern)
 - rust-lang#136311 (Ensure that we never try to monomorphize the upcasting or vtable calls of impossible dyn types)
 - rust-lang#136315 (Use short ty string for binop and unop errors)
 - rust-lang#136393 (Fix accidentally not emitting overflowing literals lints anymore in patterns)
 - rust-lang#136530 (Implement `x perf` directly in bootstrap)
 - rust-lang#136580 (Couple of changes to run rustc in miri)
 - rust-lang#136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134367 (Stabilize `feature(trait_upcasting)`)
 - rust-lang#135354 ([Debuginfo] Add MSVC Synthetic and Summary providers to LLDB)
 - rust-lang#135940 (Update toolstate maintainers)
 - rust-lang#135945 (Remove some unnecessary parens in `assert!` conditions)
 - rust-lang#136577 (Pattern Migration 2024: try to suggest eliding redundant binding modifiers)
 - rust-lang#136598 (Fix suggestion for `dependency_on_unit_never_type_fallback` involving closures + format args expansions)
 - rust-lang#136653 (Remove dead code from rustc_codegen_llvm and the LLVM wrapper)
 - rust-lang#136664 (replace one `.map_or(true, ...)` with `.is_none_or(...)`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
…=chenyukang

Implement pattern type ffi checks

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for `NonZero` and `NonNull` after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 7, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #136697) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 7, 2025
@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the pattern-type-ffi-checks branch from 60ed9db to f1f996a Compare February 11, 2025 08:52
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Feb 11, 2025

@bors r=chenyukang

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2025

📌 Commit f1f996a has been approved by chenyukang

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 11, 2025
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
…=chenyukang

Implement pattern type ffi checks

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for `NonZero` and `NonNull` after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134090 (Stabilize target_feature_11)
 - rust-lang#134999 (Add cygwin target.)
 - rust-lang#135025 (Cast allocas to default address space)
 - rust-lang#135408 (x86: make SSE2 required for i686 hardfloat targets and use it to pass SIMD types)
 - rust-lang#135549 (Document some safety constraints and use more safe wrappers)
 - rust-lang#136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
 - rust-lang#136699 (std: replace the `FromInner` implementation for addresses with private conversion functions)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#136758 (tests: `-Copt-level=3` instead of `-O` in assembly tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
…=chenyukang

Implement pattern type ffi checks

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for `NonZero` and `NonNull` after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135549 (Document some safety constraints and use more safe wrappers)
 - rust-lang#135965 (In "specify type" suggestion, skip type params that are already known)
 - rust-lang#136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
 - rust-lang#136646 (Add a TyPat in the AST to reuse the generic arg lowering logic)
 - rust-lang#136699 (std: replace the `FromInner` implementation for addresses with private conversion functions)
 - rust-lang#136874 (Change the issue number for `likely_unlikely` and `cold_path`)
 - rust-lang#136884 (Lower fn items as ZST valtrees and delay a bug)
 - rust-lang#136885 (i686-linux-android: increase CPU baseline to Pentium 4 (without an actual change)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135549 (Document some safety constraints and use more safe wrappers)
 - rust-lang#135965 (In "specify type" suggestion, skip type params that are already known)
 - rust-lang#136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
 - rust-lang#136646 (Add a TyPat in the AST to reuse the generic arg lowering logic)
 - rust-lang#136874 (Change the issue number for `likely_unlikely` and `cold_path`)
 - rust-lang#136884 (Lower fn items as ZST valtrees and delay a bug)
 - rust-lang#136885 (i686-linux-android: increase CPU baseline to Pentium 4 (without an actual change)
 - rust-lang#136891 (Check sig for errors before checking for unconstrained anonymous lifetime)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2f3f83a into rust-lang:master Feb 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Feb 12, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136193 - oli-obk:pattern-type-ffi-checks, r=chenyukang

Implement pattern type ffi checks

Previously we just rejected pattern types outright in FFI, but that was never meant to be a permanent situation. We'll need them supported to use them as the building block for `NonZero` and `NonNull` after all (both of which are FFI safe).

best reviewed commit by commit.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants