-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Revert wf sized check on beta #138122
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Revert wf sized check on beta #138122
Conversation
r? @wesleywiser rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser. Use |
|
Some changes occurred in tests/rustdoc-json |
Meta tip: rustbot now understands when |
[beta] backports - Windows: Fix error in `fs::rename` on Windows 1607 rust-lang#137528 - rustdoc: when merging target features, keep the highest stability rust-lang#137632 - doctests: fix merging on stable rust-lang#137899 - Revert wf sized check on beta rust-lang#138122 r? cuviper
[beta] backports - Windows: Fix error in `fs::rename` on Windows 1607 rust-lang#137528 - rustdoc: when merging target features, keep the highest stability rust-lang#137632 - doctests: fix merging on stable rust-lang#137899 - Revert wf sized check on beta rust-lang#138122 r? cuviper
Merged in #138525. |
Revert #136274 on beta. See #137186 (comment).
This was fixed by #137298 on master, but that PR includes some non-trivial changes to the way we do typechecking and wfchecking in the compiler, and while I'm confident about the implementation, there is a chance it introduces new cycle errors or something, so I'd prefer if we actually let this bake the proper amount.