-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
[Experiment] Check that corresponding trait goal holds when projection is rigid #139763
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
[Experiment] Check that corresponding trait goal holds when projection is rigid #139763
Conversation
@bors try |
…lver, r=<try> [Experiment] Check that corresponding trait goal holds when projection is rigid r? `@ghost`
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
@craterbot check |
👌 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
🚧 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
🎉 Experiment
|
As expected, 1 quadrillion regressions. These will almost certainly need to be fixed in the new solver. |
Don't require rigid alias's trait to hold See test for write-up. TL;DR is that we don't need the trait bound to hold, since we enforce it during WF. I think this is preferable to introducing (if we even could do so) a more specific hack around coroutine interiors, higher ranked types, etc, since this is just a manifestation of more pervasive issues w/ lifetime erasure in coroutines. This just doesn't manifest in the old solver b/c it doesn't try to prove `T: Trait` holds when rigidly projecting `<T as Trait>::Assoc`. It's pretty clear that this affects quite a few traits (rust-lang#139763), so I think this needs fixing. r? lcnr Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#177
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139828 - compiler-errors:rigid-trait, r=lcnr Don't require rigid alias's trait to hold See test for write-up. TL;DR is that we don't need the trait bound to hold, since we enforce it during WF. I think this is preferable to introducing (if we even could do so) a more specific hack around coroutine interiors, higher ranked types, etc, since this is just a manifestation of more pervasive issues w/ lifetime erasure in coroutines. This just doesn't manifest in the old solver b/c it doesn't try to prove `T: Trait` holds when rigidly projecting `<T as Trait>::Assoc`. It's pretty clear that this affects quite a few traits (rust-lang#139763), so I think this needs fixing. r? lcnr Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#177
Don't require rigid alias's trait to hold See test for write-up. TL;DR is that we don't need the trait bound to hold, since we enforce it during WF. I think this is preferable to introducing (if we even could do so) a more specific hack around coroutine interiors, higher ranked types, etc, since this is just a manifestation of more pervasive issues w/ lifetime erasure in coroutines. This just doesn't manifest in the old solver b/c it doesn't try to prove `T: Trait` holds when rigidly projecting `<T as Trait>::Assoc`. It's pretty clear that this affects quite a few traits (rust-lang/rust#139763), so I think this needs fixing. r? lcnr Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#177
r? @ghost