Skip to content

parser: Remove old diagnostic notes for type ascription syntax #139908

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2025

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

Type ascription syntax was removed by #109128 in 2023, so “remove this again in a few months” is long overdue.

Happily, this also reduces the amount of parser diagnostic code that cares whether the compiler is unstable.


See also the recent #138898, which removed some other related dead code but declined to touch the diagnostics.

It's possible that some of these parser tests are no longer useful at all, but I haven't investigated them for this PR.

Type ascription syntax was removed in 2023.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2025

r? @BoxyUwU

rustbot has assigned @BoxyUwU.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice cleanup!

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 16, 2025

📌 Commit 4d6ae78 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned jieyouxu and unassigned BoxyUwU Apr 16, 2025
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 16, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
parser: Remove old diagnostic notes for type ascription syntax

Type ascription syntax was removed by rust-lang#109128 in 2023, so “remove this again in a few months” is long overdue.

Happily, this also reduces the amount of parser diagnostic code that cares whether the compiler is unstable.

---

See also the recent rust-lang#138898, which removed some other related dead code but declined to touch the diagnostics.

It's possible that some of these parser tests are no longer useful at all, but I haven't investigated them for this PR.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139084 (hygiene: Rename semi-transparent to semi-opaque)
 - rust-lang#139236 (Use a session counter to make anon dep nodes unique)
 - rust-lang#139650 (Fix `register_group_alias` for tools)
 - rust-lang#139770 (Rename `LifetimeName` as `LifetimeKind`.)
 - rust-lang#139846 (Remove `kw::Empty` uses in rustdoc)
 - rust-lang#139891 (Include optional dso_local marker for functions in `enum-match.rs`)
 - rust-lang#139908 (parser: Remove old diagnostic notes for type ascription syntax)
 - rust-lang#139917 (fix for multiple `#[repr(align(N))]` on functions)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#139615 (Remove `name_or_empty`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 082073f into rust-lang:master Apr 17, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 17, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139908 - Zalathar:no-ascription, r=jieyouxu

parser: Remove old diagnostic notes for type ascription syntax

Type ascription syntax was removed by rust-lang#109128 in 2023, so “remove this again in a few months” is long overdue.

Happily, this also reduces the amount of parser diagnostic code that cares whether the compiler is unstable.

---

See also the recent rust-lang#138898, which removed some other related dead code but declined to touch the diagnostics.

It's possible that some of these parser tests are no longer useful at all, but I haven't investigated them for this PR.
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the no-ascription branch April 17, 2025 05:38
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants