Skip to content

Feature gate box syntax #20723

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jan 8, 2015
Merged

Conversation

pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@pnkfelix pnkfelix commented Jan 7, 2015

Added box_syntax feature gate; added to std and rustc crates for bootstrap.

To avoid using the feature, change uses of box <expr> to Box::new(<expr>) alternative, as noted by the feature gate message.

(Note that box patterns have no analogous trivial replacement, at least not in general; you need to revise the code to do a partial match, deref, and then the rest of the match.)

[breaking-change]

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

pnkfelix commented Jan 7, 2015

(i'm still doing a local make check run now; hopefully this one will work. i had some problems with an earlier strategy I was employing and am hoping this "dead simple" approach will just work.)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

pnkfelix commented Jan 7, 2015

argh still need to pepper more crates with #![allow(unknown_feature)]

…otstrap.

To avoid using the feauture, change uses of `box <expr>` to
`Box::new(<expr>)` alternative, as noted by the feature gate message.

(Note that box patterns have no analogous trivial replacement, at
least not in general; you need to revise the code to do a partial
match, deref, and then the rest of the match.)

[breaking-change]
Specifically added to the test, librustc_trans, librustc_typeck crates.
feature gate net.

fix typo in my feature-gate-box-expr.rs test.
@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Jan 7, 2015

@pnkfelix Talking more with the rest of the core team, we actually feel like #[stable] for Box::new is fine -- note that Rc::new and friends are already #[stable], and having a standard constructor seems like a very minimal commitment regardless of how box syntax works out.

@pnkfelix pnkfelix force-pushed the feature-gate-box-syntax branch from 0d4baae to 3010e10 Compare January 7, 2015 23:45
@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Jan 7, 2015

(Thanks for getting this out so quickly btw!)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

pnkfelix commented Jan 8, 2015

(still waiting on a local make check; but i'll be tagging this with r=huonw once that is done)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

pnkfelix commented Jan 8, 2015

(handing off to acrichto to deal with remaining fallout as part of rollup)

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2015
Conflicts:
	src/compiletest/compiletest.rs
	src/libcollections/lib.rs
	src/libserialize/lib.rs
	src/libsyntax/feature_gate.rs
@bors bors merged commit ae4bcd4 into rust-lang:master Jan 8, 2015
alkor added a commit to alkor/rust-http that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2015
pnkfelix added a commit to pnkfelix/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2015
Rollup merge (373cbab) of PR rust-lang#20723
accidentally reverted a portion of commit
8327bcc which shifted
`slicing_syntax` from Active to Accepted.
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2015
…cepted, r=nikomatsakis

Rollup merge (373cbab) of PR rust-lang#20723
accidentally reverted a portion of commit
8327bcc which shifted
`slicing_syntax` from Active to Accepted.
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2015
…cepted, r=nikomatsakis

Rollup merge (373cbab) of PR rust-lang#20723
accidentally reverted a portion of commit
8327bcc which shifted
`slicing_syntax` from Active to Accepted.
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2015
…cepted, r=nikomatsakis

Re-tag `slicing_syntax` as `Accepted`.

Rollup merge (373cbab) of PR rust-lang#20723
accidentally reverted a portion of commit
8327bcc which shifted
`slicing_syntax` from Active to Accepted.
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2015
…cepted, r=nikomatsakis

 Re-tag `slicing_syntax` as `Accepted`.

Rollup merge (373cbab) of PR rust-lang#20723
accidentally reverted a portion of commit
8327bcc which shifted
`slicing_syntax` from Active to Accepted.
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2015
As part of the audit for rust-lang#22820 the following duplicate feature
gate tests were removed:

* `box_patterns`
* `simd_ffi`

These tests for `box_patterns` and `simd_ffi` were added in rust-lang#23578,
however there were existing tests in rust-lang#20723 and rust-lang#21233 respectively.

r? @nrc
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2015
As part of the audit for rust-lang#22820 the following duplicate feature
gate tests were removed:

* `box_patterns`
* `simd_ffi`

These tests for `box_patterns` and `simd_ffi` were added in rust-lang#23578,
however there were existing tests in rust-lang#20723 and rust-lang#21233 respectively.

r? @nrc
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2015
As part of the audit for rust-lang#22820 the following duplicate feature
gate tests were removed:

* `box_patterns`
* `simd_ffi`

These tests for `box_patterns` and `simd_ffi` were added in rust-lang#23578,
however there were existing tests in rust-lang#20723 and rust-lang#21233 respectively.

r? @nrc
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants