Skip to content

lint: fixup extraneous #[allow] #22374

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2015
Merged

lint: fixup extraneous #[allow] #22374

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2015

Conversation

richo
Copy link
Contributor

@richo richo commented Feb 15, 2015

This snuck through my refactor.

Would it be worth the effort to have a test pass that attempts to lint the code for all targets, even if it's not feasible to actually build and test it?

This snuck through my refactor
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Feb 16, 2015

@bors r+ 7486

There has definitely been interest in "metadata only" builds, which would cover this sort of thing.

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Feb 16, 2015

@bors rollup

@richo
Copy link
Contributor Author

richo commented Feb 16, 2015

Is there a ticket/RFC for the metadata only builds? I'm still working through some power issues and have been offered access to ppc64le machines for a port, this would save me a lot of time.

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2015
This snuck through my refactor.

Would it be worth the effort to have a test pass that attempts to lint the code for all targets, even if it's not feasible to actually build and test it?
@bors bors merged commit 74864b3 into rust-lang:master Feb 17, 2015
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants