Skip to content

SHA-1 implementation #230

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Feb 21, 2011
Merged

SHA-1 implementation #230

1 commit merged into from
Feb 21, 2011

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Feb 21, 2011

Please review.

It's currently in a 'sha1' module, but maybe it belongs in 'crypto' or similar. Also, I haven't provided any way to convert the digest to a hex-formatted string. Do you have an opinion on where that belongs?

oli-obk added a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
kazcw pushed a commit to kazcw/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2018
* sse: add missing aliases

_m_pextrw, _m_pinsrw, _m_pmovmskb, _m_pshufw

* sse: _mm_maskmove_si64, _m_maskmovq

* sse: _mm_mulhi_pu16, _m_pmulhuw

* sse: _mm_avg_pu8, _m_pavgb

* sse: _mm_avg_pu16, _m_pavgw

* sse: _mm_sad_pu8, _m_psadbw

* sse: _mm_cvtpi32_ps

* sse: _mm_cvtpi32x2_ps
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
…reference

Add mention of RFC 2128 (use_nested_groups) in the reference
matthiaskrgr pushed a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2023
celinval pushed a commit to celinval/rust-dev that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
This harness takes between 22-25 minutes in CI. Change the harnesses's
macro to use kissat solver instead, which brings verification time down
to ~7 seconds.

As an aside, I noticed this problem because the partition 1 runner in
rust-lang#229 is taking ~55 minutes, where the other partitions are taking ~30
minutes. This harness accounts for almost the entire difference. One
nice consequence of partitioning verification is that it will make
performance issues like this more noticeable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.
This pull request was closed.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant