Skip to content

Clarify intention wrt integers #25002

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2015
Merged

Clarify intention wrt integers #25002

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2015

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Fixes #24767

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

r? @pnkfelix

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned pnkfelix and unassigned huonw Apr 30, 2015
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 1e40360 rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 1e40360 into rust-lang:master May 1, 2015
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std::fmt future-proofing: should precision be static error for integral types?
6 participants