Skip to content

trans: Use an isize to count the number of registers so we don't underflow for fn's with > 7 args in debug builds. #29091

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2015

Conversation

luqmana
Copy link
Member

@luqmana luqmana commented Oct 16, 2015

Fixes #29073.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 16, 2015

📌 Commit 8719e94 has been approved by pnkfelix

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@luqmana btw, were you testing/developing this in a debug build? (Probably not since bootstrapping debug-builds is currently hosed.)

I ask because this seems like a case we could add to the list of "bugs that would be caught by overflow/underflow checking arithmetic"...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 16, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 8719e94 with merge 02ffb5f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 16, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt

// a, b, c, d should be in registers
// e, f should be on the stack
// s should be byval pointer on the stack
void byval_many_rect(int32_t a, int32_t b, int32_t c, int32_t d, int32_t e, int32_t f, struct Rect s) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line failed tidy (> 100 chars).

…rflow for fn's with > 7 args in debug builds.
@luqmana luqmana force-pushed the 29073-overflow-cabi branch from 8719e94 to 82f08ea Compare October 17, 2015 01:11
@luqmana
Copy link
Member Author

luqmana commented Oct 17, 2015

@bors r=pnkfelix

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 17, 2015

📌 Commit 82f08ea has been approved by pnkfelix

@luqmana
Copy link
Member Author

luqmana commented Oct 17, 2015

@pnkfelix Yea, it was with just --enable-optimize i believe since op+debug was broken and just debug too long.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 17, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 82f08ea with merge 92af6a1...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 17, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt

@apasel422
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this timed out.

@dotdash
Copy link
Contributor

dotdash commented Oct 17, 2015

@bors retry
Am 17.10.2015 14:35 schrieb "Andrew Paseltiner" notifications@github.com:

Looks like this timed out.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#29091 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 17, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 82f08ea with merge cbdd5ac...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 17, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt

@apasel422
Copy link
Contributor

It doesn't seem like the test failure is related to this PR. I was able to compile and run all tests successfully on my local 64-bit Linux machine with optimizations enabled.

@luqmana
Copy link
Member Author

luqmana commented Oct 18, 2015

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 18, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 82f08ea with merge 4af89fe...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 82f08ea into rust-lang:master Oct 18, 2015
@luqmana luqmana deleted the 29073-overflow-cabi branch October 29, 2015 00:51
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants