Skip to content

1.7 release notes #31099

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2016
Merged

1.7 release notes #31099

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2016

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Jan 22, 2016

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 22, 2016

Please review @rust-lang/libs @rust-lang/lang @rust-lang/compiler

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 22, 2016

I'm not mentioning new unstable features like #[deprecated] or type ascription.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Big +1 to doing this overall.

On Jan 21, 2016, 19:06 -0500, Brian Andersonnotifications@github.com, wrote:

I'm not mentioning new unstable features like#[deprecated]or type ascription.


Reply to this email directly orview it on GitHub(#31099 (comment)).

[`Vec::as_mut_slice`],
[`String::as_str`],
[`String::as_mut_str`],
`<[T]>::`[`clone_from_slice`],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a good place for a note about new behavior in clone_from_slice? It should say that clone_from_slice now requires the two slices to be the same length (and panics otherwise).

@brson brson added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Jan 22, 2016
@@ -1,3 +1,353 @@
Version 1.7.0 (2016-03-03)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be a good idea to make it more obvious this hasn't been released yet and that this is technically a draft?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a good idea, but I think I won't do it. It would require patching both the beta and master branches later.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

r=me once you feel this is good to go

[`collections::hash_set::HashSet::drain`],
[`collections::binary_heap::Drain`],
[`collections::binary_heap::BinaryHeap::drain`],
[`Vec::extend_from_slice`] (renamed from `push_all`),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need a [] after the ] here.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 29, 2016

@bors r=alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 29, 2016

📌 Commit 6dbff05 has been approved by alexcrichton

[`i32::overflowing_shl`],
[`i32::overflowing_shr`],
[`u32::checked_rem`],
[`u32::checked_neg`],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is missing a url

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 29, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 6dbff05 with merge 24cd6a3...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 29, 2016

⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: rollup

Sorry I interrupted to see if I can get the LLVM upgrade to land or otherwise the bots are just gonna keep oscillating back and forth between various versions of LLVM. It may not work out though...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 6dbff05 with merge 43ee048...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-cross-opt

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:23 PM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-linux-cross-opt
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-cross-opt/builds/1070


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31099 (comment).

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 6dbff05 into rust-lang:master Jan 30, 2016
@brson brson added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Feb 26, 2016
@brson brson mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Feb 26, 2016
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants