Skip to content

don't ICE on a couple of missing lang items #31564

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2016

Conversation

durka
Copy link
Contributor

@durka durka commented Feb 11, 2016

This changes three ICEs to fatal errors.

I've grepped for lang_item.*expect and \.expect.*lang and didn't come up with any more. But, there could be more ICEs lurking.

I wasn't sure about a test because there already is a cfail test for missing lang items, but it only checks one.

Relevant to (already closed) #31477 #31480 #31558.
cc @LilRed

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2016

📌 Commit 433f347 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 13, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 433f347 with merge 1ab22d7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
This changes three ICEs to fatal errors.

I've grepped for `lang_item.*expect` and `\.expect.*lang` and didn't come up with any more. But, there could be more ICEs lurking.

I wasn't sure about a test because there already _is_ a cfail test for missing lang items, but it only checks one.

Relevant to (already closed) #31477 #31480 #31558.
cc @LilRed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants