Skip to content

resolve: print location of static for "static in pattern" error #33340

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2016

Conversation

birkenfeld
Copy link
Contributor

The implementation mirrors the one for "constant defined here" annotation used for constant patterns in the irrefutable-pattern case.

Fixes: #23716

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Aatch

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

static foo: i32 = 0;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test for the import resolution? r=me with or without fix

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors delegate+

r=Manishearth this once you add the test.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 2, 2016

✌️ @birkenfeld can now approve this pull request

@birkenfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Manishearth sorry, what exactly do I do? @b0rs r=Manishearth?

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

yes, with an o instead of a 0

@birkenfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

birkenfeld commented May 2, 2016

yes, with an o instead of a 0

that was intentional to avoid triggering it - I don't know how zealous it is in parsing these comments :)

The implementation mirrors the one for "constant defined here" annotation
used for constant patterns in the irrefutable-pattern case.

Fixes: rust-lang#23716
@birkenfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=Manishearth

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 3, 2016

📌 Commit 4ba6bf4 has been approved by Manishearth

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2016
resolve: print location of static for "static in pattern" error

The implementation mirrors the one for "constant defined here" annotation used for constant patterns in the irrefutable-pattern case.

Fixes: rust-lang#23716
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2016
Rollup of 14 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33277, #33294, #33314, #33322, #33333, #33338, #33339, #33340, #33343, #33357, #33363, #33365, #33371, #33372
- Failed merges:
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2016
Rollup of 14 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33277, #33294, #33314, #33322, #33333, #33338, #33339, #33340, #33343, #33357, #33363, #33365, #33371, #33372
- Failed merges:
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2016
Rollup of 14 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33277, #33294, #33314, #33322, #33333, #33338, #33339, #33340, #33343, #33357, #33363, #33365, #33371, #33372
- Failed merges:
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2016
Rollup of 14 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33277, #33294, #33314, #33322, #33333, #33338, #33339, #33340, #33343, #33357, #33363, #33365, #33371, #33372
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 4ba6bf4 into rust-lang:master May 5, 2016
@birkenfeld birkenfeld deleted the issue-23716 branch May 6, 2016 04:06
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants