Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Implement RFC 1506 "Clarify the relationships between various kinds of structs and variants" #35138

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2016

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented Jul 31, 2016

cc #35626

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #35015) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased, tracking issue number added.
r? @eddyb

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned eddyb and unassigned pnkfelix Aug 12, 2016
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Aug 12, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 12, 2016

📌 Commit f662478 has been approved by eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 13, 2016

⌛ Testing commit f662478 with merge d3c3de8...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2016
Implement RFC 1506 "Clarify the relationships between various kinds of structs and variants"

cc #35626
@bors bors merged commit f662478 into rust-lang:master Aug 13, 2016
jseyfried added a commit to jseyfried/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2016
Fix #[derive] for empty tuple structs/variants

This was missing from rust-lang#35138
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the clarify branch September 21, 2016 20:01
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants