Skip to content

normalize tuple pair types in trans #37110

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

TimNN
Copy link
Contributor

@TimNN TimNN commented Oct 12, 2016

Fixes #37109.

Note that #37109 is a regression from stable to stable, beta and nightly.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Aatch

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Oct 12, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 12, 2016

📌 Commit 7badc32 has been approved by eddyb

@eddyb eddyb added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Oct 12, 2016
@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Oct 12, 2016

Why are we passing a non-normalized tuple around anyway?

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Oct 12, 2016

Oh for some reason I thought this had soemthing to do with tuple structs, oops. Yeah that is interesting, makes this only a bandaid.

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Oct 12, 2016

I have a better fix.

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Oct 12, 2016

@bors r-

@TimNN TimNN closed this Oct 12, 2016
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2016
normalize tuple pair types in trans

Fixes rust-lang#37109.

Note that rust-lang#37109 is a regression from stable to stable, beta and nightly.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2016
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Oct 14, 2016

It's not clear that this should be backported to beta, or that #37129 should instead.

@brson brson removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Oct 14, 2016
@TimNN TimNN deleted the fix-37109 branch April 7, 2017 20:14
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants