Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #40160

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

MajorBreakfast and others added 10 commits February 28, 2017 10:58
This contains two important bugfixes
I made these the same order as they were in the compiler, but for no good reason. Much easier to find out what you need when they're sorted alphabetically
Structs doc: Change "pointers" to "references"

Let's call them "references" instead of "pointers". That's how they're called in chapter 4.9 "References and Borrowing".

r? @steveklabnik
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample

r? @steveklabnik

BTW it seems that
```Rust
let p = Proton {};
```
compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.
…arget-has-atomic, r=alexcrichton

Add compile test for cfg_target_has_atomic

Issue rust-lang#39059.
I am concerned about whether the test is excessive.
update mdbook version

This contains two important bugfixes
…ook, r=frewsxcv

sort unstable book alphabetically

I made these the same order as they were in the compiler, but for no good reason. Much easier to find out what you need when they're sorted alphabetically

r? @frewsxcv
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

@steveklabnik: no appropriate reviewer found, use r? to override

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=100

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

📌 Commit adb5183 has been approved by steveklabnik

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit adb5183 with merge 11db62c...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2017
Rollup of 5 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40142, #40144, #40150, #40151, #40153
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants