Skip to content

[beta] travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia #41397

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2017
Merged

[beta] travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia #41397

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2017

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This is a backport of #41130 which...

Closes #41396

@petrhosek @alexcrichton
travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia
f5cc0de 
The Fuchsia copies of LLVM repositories contain additional patches
for work-in-progress features and there is some amount of churn that
may break Rust. Use upstream LLVM repositories instead for building
the toolchain used by the Fuchsia builder.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=aidanhs p=1

(beta backport)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

📌 Commit f5cc0de has been approved by aidanhs

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

⌛ Testing commit f5cc0de with merge 31d51d5...

@alexcrichton alexcrichton mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
Merged
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@aidanhs aidanhs mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
Closed
@aidanhs
Copy link
Member

aidanhs commented Apr 19, 2017 

Undefined symbols for architecture i386:

  "_OBJ_bsearch_ex_", referenced from:

      _sk_find in libcrypto.a(stack.o)

      _sk_find_ex in libcrypto.a(stack.o)

ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386

Possible variant of #40417? Definitely unrelated to this PR.

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Apr 19, 2017

Looks like it

@bors retry

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@bors p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

⌛ Testing commit f5cc0de with merge be2574b...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@aidanhs
Copy link
Member

aidanhs commented Apr 19, 2017

Time limit exceeded. Looks like it rebuilt the docker image. sccache should have everything cached now so should work with a retry?

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
@frewsxcv
Rollup merge of rust-lang#41397 - alexcrichton:beta-next, r=aidanhs
afa2587 
[beta] travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia

This is a backport of rust-lang#41130 which...

Closes rust-lang#41396
@frewsxcv frewsxcv mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #41406 - frewsxcv:rollup, r=frewsxcv
e64b987 
[beta] Rollup of 2 pull requests

- Successful merges: #41365, #41397
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit f5cc0de into rust-lang:beta Apr 20, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 20, 2017

⌛ Testing commit f5cc0de with merge e64b987...

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Apr 21, 2017

@bors r-

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@aturon aturon

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@alexcrichton @rust-highfive @bors @aidanhs @arielb1 @frewsxcv @aturon @petrhosek