Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Unignore android for previously spuriously failing test. #41618

Closed

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented Apr 29, 2017

Will see if this start failing again, in which case we'll re-ignore the test.

In theory, #20004 could be fixed by this. I've left that open because it's possible that this will resume the previous spurious failures, and marked it as A-spurious so people doing PR triage catch that. I will leave a comment there saying that if we see failures from this test on android, we should re-ignore it.

Will see if this start failing again, in which case we'll re-ignore the test.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Apr 29, 2017

Let's give it a shot! A bunch has changed since then...

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 29, 2017

📌 Commit bd4191d has been approved by aturon

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2017
…turon

Unignore android for previously spuriously failing test.

Will see if this start failing again, in which case we'll re-ignore the test.

In theory, rust-lang#20004 could be fixed by this. I've left that open because it's possible that this will resume the previous spurious failures, and marked it as A-spurious so people doing PR triage catch that. I will leave a comment there saying that if we see failures from this test on android, we should re-ignore it.
@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

Ah. Unfortunate. Closing.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants