Skip to content

Stabilize abi_sysv64 #46528

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2017
Merged

Conversation

CensoredUsername
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #36167, stabilizing the use of the "sysv64" ABI on x64 platforms where it is not the default ABI.

FCP on this is complete in the tracking issue.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @arielb1

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 6, 2017
@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Dec 6, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2017

📌 Commit d68d127 has been approved by arielb1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 7, 2017

⌛ Testing commit d68d127 with merge d516d5d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2017
Stabilize abi_sysv64

Closes #36167, stabilizing the use of the "sysv64" ABI on x64 platforms where it is not the default ABI.

FCP on this is complete in the tracking issue.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 7, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: arielb1
Pushing d516d5d to master...

@bors bors merged commit d68d127 into rust-lang:master Dec 7, 2017
@steveklabnik steveklabnik added the relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. label Dec 7, 2017
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants