Skip to content

syntax: Follow-up to the incorrect qpath recovery PR #46827

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 21, 2017

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

cc #46788

Add tests checking that "priority" of qpath recovery is higher than priority of unary and binary operators
Fix regressed parsing of paths with fn-like generic arguments
r? @estebank

--> $DIR/bad-assoc-ty.rs:37:10
|
37 | type G = 'static + (Send)::AssocTy;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `< 'static + Send>::AssocTy`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

stray space?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, all object types are actually pretty-printed like this.
Since it came up again, I'll fix this tomorrow, probably in a separate PR.

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 18, 2017

📌 Commit 48699b0 has been approved by estebank

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 19, 2017
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Fix whitespacing issues in pretty-printing of bounds

cc rust-lang#46827 (comment)
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=estebank

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2017

📌 Commit d333752 has been approved by estebank

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2017
syntax: Follow-up to the incorrect qpath recovery PR

cc rust-lang#46788

Add tests checking that "priority" of qpath recovery is higher than priority of unary and binary operators
Fix regressed parsing of paths with fn-like generic arguments
r? @estebank
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2017
Rollup of 5 pull requests

- Successful merges: #46827, #46853, #46860, #46861, #46887
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit d333752 into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2017
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the assocrecov2 branch June 5, 2019 15:59
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants