-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Rebased refactorings for Chalk #47861
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Rebased refactorings for Chalk #47861
Conversation
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #47837) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
... Well that didn't last for long, did it? |
37c4b69
to
cd8bc39
Compare
@bors try I'd like do some perf measurements on this. |
…, r=<try> Rebased refactorings for Chalk The code is Niko's, I just handled the rebase. r? @nikomatsakis
☀️ Test successful - status-travis |
@Mark-Simulacrum Perf needed, |
Perf started. ETA around 45-50 minutes. |
@Mark-Simulacrum ping :) |
@kennytm thanks! =) |
@nikomatsakis @sgrif what's the status on this? |
I'm going to look into the perf today |
0082951 is not the problem |
Should be good to go now |
@bors try Should we repeat the perf run? seems like a reasonable thing to do. |
@bors clean retry try |
🔒 Merge conflict |
🔒 Merge conflict |
These changes were meant to be in 2b18d8fe9dc05415a8e6b7cadf879c7f7ebe020a (rebased from 12a2305), but I messed up the rebase a bit as the file had been moved.
These modules were replaced with re-exports from ena
Additional uses of this item were added to these files in rust-lang#45701 and rust-lang#46479
c16caff
to
fec4d3b
Compare
I rebased again, though there were no merge conflicts... :/ |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit fec4d3b has been approved by |
…, r=nikomatsakis Rebased refactorings for Chalk The code is Niko's, I just handled the rebase. r? @nikomatsakis
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
large perf regression when this landed http://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=3eeb5a665e313c5b281820099e04d4c6c8188b46&end=ddfbf2b0f4726f11bc8e857274ae1a0f8343a73f&stat=instructions:u can it be the bump of ena that changed the times after the last perf run? |
@ishitatsuyuki opened #48660 to track the perf regression, but I think we ought to roll it back till we understand the cause. Could be the bump of ena, thought that would be quite surprising. |
This reverts commit ccd92c2. This commit is the source of a major perf regression, and was not intended to be included in rust-lang#47861. At some point I must have accidentally re-added the commit.
Revert "correct subtle bug in the type variable code" This reverts commit ccd92c2. This commit is the source of a major perf regression, and was not intended to be included in #47861. At some point I must have accidentally re-added the commit. Fixes #48660. r? @nikomatsakis
The code is Niko's, I just handled the rebase.
r? @nikomatsakis