-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Implement implied shortcut links for intra-rustdoc-links #48335
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
Shouldn't this wait until the referenced PR is merged upstream and set into a release? |
Yes, that's why it says "needs X". I'm putting this up for testing and review 😄 |
70d620d
to
5fdc10c
Compare
Raph did a release, ready to land. r? |
Dang, that came together fast. r=me pending travis |
@bors r=QuietMisdreavus |
📌 Commit 5fdc10c has been approved by |
…Misdreavus Implement implied shortcut links for intra-rustdoc-links cc rust-lang#43466 Needs pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#126 r? @QuietMisdreavus
…Misdreavus Fixes rust-lang#47311. r? @nrc
…Misdreavus Implement implied shortcut links for intra-rustdoc-links cc rust-lang#43466 Needs pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#126 r? @QuietMisdreavus
I wonder if this should be tracked for |
It's not stable and will stabilize all in one go
…On Feb 24, 2018 8:02 AM, "Jon Gjengset" ***@***.***> wrote:
I wonder if this should be tracked for relnotes. It's *such* a win for
well-interlinked documentation that as many people as possible should be
aware of it!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#48335 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABivSAST6YOL4fXPUH_qYFyUUdJEU1IQks5tYDKmgaJpZM4SJ5Am>
.
|
Sorry, what I meant is that when this does stabilize, and #43466 is brought up, the feature landed in this PR specifically should be highlighted. |
This is amazing, but is it known that this doesn't work for backticked paths?
Backticks are allowed in implied reference links in the RFC. |
That's supposed to work with this PR, given that the intra-links test verifies that shortcut links with backticks properly resolve. |
idk why the test passes, the current implementation doesn't seem to work here (I thought it would but on second thoughts it's missing some things); I need to fix that 😄 |
cc #43466
Needs pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#126
r? @QuietMisdreavus