Skip to content

Filter out missing components from manifests #49705

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2018

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit updates our manifest generation for rustup to filter out any
components/extensions which are actually missing. This is intended to help
mitigate #49462 by making the manifests reflect reality, that many targets now
are missing a rust-docs component rather than requiring it exists.

This commit updates our manifest generation for rustup to filter out any
components/extensions which are actually missing. This is intended to help
mitigate rust-lang#49462 by making the manifests reflect reality, that many targets now
are missing a `rust-docs` component rather than requiring it exists.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @kennytm

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Apr 5, 2018

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 5, 2018

📌 Commit 59059f2 has been approved by kennytm

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 5, 2018
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2018
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2018
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #49045 (Make queries thread safe)
 - #49350 (Expand macros in `extern {}` blocks)
 - #49497 (Chalkify - Tweak `Clause` definition and HRTBs)
 - #49597 (proc_macro: Reorganize public API)
 - #49686 (typos)
- #49621
- #49697
- #49705

Failed merges:
@Hoverbear
Copy link
Contributor

Would this allow for the use of the previously broken builds, or only new builds?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

No, this'd only fix builds going forward

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants