Skip to content

Implement Copy for std::alloc::Layout #50109

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2018
Merged

Conversation

SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #48458

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Highfive failed to assign a reviewer, picking someone randomly -- @sfackler

@pietroalbini pietroalbini added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 20, 2018
@sfackler
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 21, 2018

📌 Commit 1caaafd has been approved by sfackler

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 21, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 22, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 1caaafd with merge 835b864...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2018
Implement Copy for std::alloc::Layout

Fixes #48458
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 22, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: sfackler
Pushing 835b864 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 1caaafd into rust-lang:master Apr 22, 2018
@SimonSapin SimonSapin deleted the copy branch May 16, 2018 15:45
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants