Skip to content

Hash EntryKind::AssociatedConst const data #50207

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2018

Conversation

wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Related to #49991
r? @michaelwoerister
cc @eddyb

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 25, 2018
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Apr 25, 2018

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2018

📌 Commit d81d081 has been approved by eddyb

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 25, 2018
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

It won't hurt but this isn't actually needed since the HashStable implementation for Lazy<T> is a no-op. Metadata hashing is dead code nowadays anyway, afaik.

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2018
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2018
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #50177 (mark std::str::replace(,n) as #[must_use])
 - #50207 (Hash EntryKind::AssociatedConst const data)
 - #50214 (Js improvements)
 - #50219 (Added missing `.` in docs.)

Failed merges:

 - #50229 (Add setting to go to item if there is only one result)
@bors bors merged commit d81d081 into rust-lang:master Apr 26, 2018
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants