Skip to content

rustdoc: process cross-crate glob re-exports #51584

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2018

Conversation

QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Member

Turns out, we were deliberately ignoring glob re-exports when they were occurring across crates, even though we were fully processing them for local re-exports. This will at least bring the two into parity.

Fixes #51252

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @frewsxcv

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 15, 2018
@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Member Author

r? @ollie27

@ollie27
Copy link
Member

ollie27 commented Jun 16, 2018

Looks good to me.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 16, 2018

@ollie27: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors delegate=ollie27
@bors r=ollie27

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 16, 2018

📌 Commit 042f1df has been approved by ollie27

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 16, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 16, 2018

✌️ @ollie27 can now approve this pull request

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 16, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 042f1df with merge b2bbb5a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2018
rustdoc: process cross-crate glob re-exports

Turns out, we were deliberately ignoring glob re-exports when they were occurring across crates, even though we were fully processing them for local re-exports. This will at least bring the two into parity.

Fixes #51252
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 16, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: ollie27
Pushing b2bbb5a to master...

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants