Skip to content

Suggest correct comparison against negative literal #51883

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2018

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

When parsing as emplacement syntax (x<-1), suggest the correct syntax
for comparison against a negative value (x< -1).

Fix #45651.

When parsing as emplacement syntax (`x<-1`), suggest the correct syntax
for comparison against a negative value (`x< -1`).
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @varkor

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 28, 2018
@varkor
Copy link
Member

varkor commented Jun 29, 2018

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 29, 2018

@varkor: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

@varkor that's odd, you should have the privs. @nikomatsakis, can you look at that?

Let's see if this works:

@bors r=varkor

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 29, 2018

📌 Commit 23d59d0 has been approved by varkor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 29, 2018
@varkor
Copy link
Member

varkor commented Jun 29, 2018

Well, that's one fewer errors than last time 😅Maybe @bors hasn't been restarted recently enough for the changes to have had effect.

Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2018
…rkor

Suggest correct comparison against negative literal

When parsing as emplacement syntax (`x<-1`), suggest the correct syntax
for comparison against a negative value (`x< -1`).

Fix rust-lang#45651.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2018
…rkor

Suggest correct comparison against negative literal

When parsing as emplacement syntax (`x<-1`), suggest the correct syntax
for comparison against a negative value (`x< -1`).

Fix rust-lang#45651.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 1, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 23d59d0 with merge ef9a322...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2018
Suggest correct comparison against negative literal

When parsing as emplacement syntax (`x<-1`), suggest the correct syntax
for comparison against a negative value (`x< -1`).

Fix #45651.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 1, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: varkor
Pushing ef9a322 to master...

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants