-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature #53179
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
r? @pnkfelix (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
@bors: r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 2cdaf3b has been approved by |
Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature r? @alexcrichton
Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature r? @alexcrichton
Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature r? @alexcrichton
It looks like the target_feature gate test failed during a rollup: #53197 (comment) |
Damn, sorry about that. I forgot to update the |
No worries! Thanks for the quick fix :) @bors r=alexcrichton |
📌 Commit c92db36 has been approved by |
Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature r? @alexcrichton
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #52773 (Avoid unnecessary pattern matching against Option and Result) - #53082 (Fix doc link (again)) - #53094 (Automatically expand section if url id point to one of its component) - #53106 (atomic ordering docs) - #53110 (Account for --remap-path-prefix in save-analysis) - #53116 (NetBSD: fix signedess of char) - #53179 (Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature) - #53183 (Suggest comma when missing in macro call) - #53207 (Add individual docs for rotate_{left, right}) - #53211 ([nll] enable feature(nll) on various crates for bootstrap) - #53214 ([nll] enable feature(nll) on various crates for bootstrap: part 2) - #53215 (Slightly refactor syntax_ext/format) - #53217 (inline some short functions) - #53219 ([nll] enable feature(nll) on various crates for bootstrap: part 3) - #53222 (A few cleanups for rustc_target)
\o/ |
FYI this just means that rustc accepts the feature in all important places. LLVM cannot properly generate code for most (all?) |
r? @alexcrichton