Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Improve a few cases of collecting to an FxHash(Map/Set) #55205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2018

Conversation

ljedrz
Copy link
Contributor

@ljedrz ljedrz commented Oct 19, 2018

Either use collect or procure specified capacity when possible.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @estebank

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 19, 2018
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 19, 2018

📌 Commit 32768574e18c41b195464678280bf874ed595f01 has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 19, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 20, 2018

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #55114) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 20, 2018
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@ljedrz You'll need to rebase against latest master.

@ljedrz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ljedrz commented Oct 28, 2018

I know the drill, just haven't had access to a PC for a few days; I'll rebase tomorrow.

@ljedrz ljedrz force-pushed the faster_fxhashmap/set_population branch from 3276857 to 73d4eec Compare October 29, 2018 08:59
@ljedrz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ljedrz commented Oct 29, 2018

@estebank rebased.

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 29, 2018

📌 Commit 73d4eec has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 29, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
…ion, r=estebank

Improve a few cases of collecting to an FxHash(Map/Set)

Either use `collect` or procure specified capacity when possible.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #54885 (Don't lint 'unused_parens` on `if (break _) { .. }`)
 - #55205 (Improve a few cases of collecting to an FxHash(Map/Set))
 - #55450 (msp430: remove the whole Atomic* API)
 - #55459 (Add UI test for #49296)
 - #55472 (Use opt.take() instead of mem::replace(opt, None))
 - #55473 (Take advantage of impl Iterator in (transitive/elaborate)_bounds)
 - #55474 (Fix validation false positive)
 - #55476 (Change a flat_map with 0/1-element vecs to a filter_map)
 - #55487 (Adjust Ids of path segments in visibility modifiers)
 - #55493 (Doc fixes)
 - #55494 (borrowck=migrate must look at parents of closures)
 - #55496 (Update clippy)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 73d4eec into rust-lang:master Oct 30, 2018
@ljedrz ljedrz deleted the faster_fxhashmap/set_population branch October 30, 2018 14:23
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants