-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Override <RangeInclusive as Iterator>::try_(r)fold #56563
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
fc9de85
to
779066e
Compare
779066e
to
46f6915
Compare
@scottmcm No idea 😐 |
✌️ @scottmcm can now approve this pull request |
Cross-reference: #57378 |
r? @rkruppe Can you take this one too, please, since you have the other RangeInclusive perf one? I think it's better that someone actually on libs handles this, and I'm biased here. |
Sorry, it doesn't seem like I'll be able to give this PR proper attention in the near future. Please assign someone else. PS: not sure if that's what you are saying, but I'm not on T-libs or even "affiliated". |
Ok... musical chairs... The luck has come to r? @Kimundi |
cc #45222
fold
ing inclusive ranges.try_rfold
forRange
is left unoverrided since I didn't see performance gain for it.Benchmarks: