Improve docs for Core::ReaderUtil. #5674
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I filled out better descriptions for all of the neccesary functions.
|
If examples are "none right now", I think they should be removed. |
|
@sanxiyn I think leaving "none right now" there encourages people to contribute patches with examples. |
|
This should fix the build error. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2013
…atamorphism I filled out better descriptions for all of the necessary functions. r?
tesuji
pushed a commit
to tesuji/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2020
…hansch,flip1995 Add doc for checking if type defines specific method This PR adds documentation on how: - check if a type defines a specific method - check an expr is calling a specific method closes: rust-lang#3843 changelog: none
This was referenced Oct 23, 2022
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I filled out better descriptions for all of the necessary
functions.
r?