Skip to content

Vim: improvements on comments #5760

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Vim: improvements on comments #5760

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

klutzy
Copy link
Contributor

@klutzy klutzy commented Apr 6, 2013

  1. disable nested comment which is not supported now
  2. add syntax highlight for rustCommentDoc e.g. /** doc */ or /// doc.

klutzy added 2 commits April 7, 2013 04:25
Since comment nesting does not work from 0.4.
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

add syntax highlight for rustCommentDoc e.g. /** doc */ or /// doc.

🤘

@thestinger
Copy link
Contributor

@klutzy: this seems to break on comments that consist of just a line with //

I'll definitely accept this if you update it for that case, making the doc comments stand out is great.

Previous commit had a bug that a line which ends with "//" or "/*"
is not correctly highlighted.
@klutzy
Copy link
Contributor Author

klutzy commented Apr 7, 2013

Vim regex always makes me crazy :)

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2013
1. disable nested comment which is not supported now
2. add syntax highlight for rustCommentDoc e.g. `/** doc */` or `/// doc`.
@bors bors closed this Apr 8, 2013
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2013
Follow-up of #5760:
Add syntax highlight for `/*! doc */` or `//! doc`.
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2020
…hearth

Deprecate regex_macro lint

Closes rust-lang#2586

changelog: Deprecate regex_macro lint
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants