Skip to content

Add os::fortanix_sgx::ffi module #57860

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2019
Merged

Add os::fortanix_sgx::ffi module #57860

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2019

Conversation

jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor

This uses the same byte slice accessors that Unix has. The ABI specifies byte slices.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @cramertj

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 23, 2019
@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @joshtriplett

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. It'd be nice if we could share these implementations among all platforms that use bytes for OS strings, and I'd greatly appreciate a follow-up PR that unifies those implementations into a single internal module, but in the meantime...

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2019

📌 Commit 8db59d4 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2019

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 23, 2019
@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I did think about this, but it's not super trivial. I guess some of these files (e.g. os_str.rs) could live in sys_common. However, for ffi.rs, currently the documentation is slightly different for each platform (and I think it should be, because it's in a different module as exposed to the user):

  • SGX-specific extension to the primitives in the std::ffi module
  • Unix-specific extension to the primitives in the std::ffi module
  • Redox-specific extension to the primitives in the std::ffi module.

Also, the stability attributes might differ. So, while the code is the same, the metadata around it isn't, and I'm not sure how to unify this into a single place.

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2019
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#57860 - jethrogb:jb/sgx-os-ffi, r=joshtriplett
eea9b2c 
Add os::fortanix_sgx::ffi module

This uses the same byte slice accessors that Unix has. The [ABI specifies](https://docs.rs/fortanix-sgx-abi/0.3.2/fortanix_sgx_abi/struct.ByteBuffer.html) byte slices.
@Centril Centril mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
Closed
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2019
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#57860 - jethrogb:jb/sgx-os-ffi, r=joshtriplett
3025949 
Add os::fortanix_sgx::ffi module

This uses the same byte slice accessors that Unix has. The [ABI specifies](https://docs.rs/fortanix-sgx-abi/0.3.2/fortanix_sgx_abi/struct.ByteBuffer.html) byte slices.
@Centril Centril mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
Merged
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@jethrogb There could be one (internal) module for all platforms that use bytes, defining the extension traits, and then the various platform-specific modules could import and re-export the bits from those modules and provide their own top-level module documentation. The docs for the extension traits themselves don't need to vary by platform.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2019
@bors
Auto merge of #57879 - Centril:rollup, r=Centril
278067d 
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #57380 (Fix Instant/Duration math precision & associativity on Windows)
 - #57606 (Get rid of the fake stack frame for reading from constants)
 - #57803 (Several changes to libunwind for SGX target)
 - #57846 (rustdoc: fix ICE from loading proc-macro stubs)
 - #57860 (Add os::fortanix_sgx::ffi module)
 - #57861 (Don't export table by default in wasm)
 - #57863 (Add suggestion for incorrect field syntax.)
 - #57867 (Fix std::future::from_generator documentation)
 - #57873 (Stabilize no_panic_pow)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 8db59d4 into rust-lang:master Jan 25, 2019
@pnkfelix pnkfelix mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2019
Closed
@jethrogb jethrogb mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2019
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2019
@bors
Auto merge of #58953 - jethrogb:jb/unify-ffi, r=alexcrichton
cb2f34d 
Unify OsString/OsStr for byte-based implementations

As requested in #57860

r? @joshtriplett
@workingjubilee workingjubilee added the O-SGX Target: SGX label Jul 30, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@joshtriplett joshtriplett

Labels
O-SGX Target: SGX S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@jethrogb @rust-highfive @joshtriplett @bors @cramertj @workingjubilee