-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Display tokens for fn qualifiers #58447
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
cc @rust-lang/rustdoc @euclio I'm... not too keen on this? It doesn't seem worth it to specially call out " One thing that this PR changes that may be necessary to track/test is that you've changed the Display output of the "alternate" mode of the function signature type and the keyword types. This is meant to print plain-text, and is used to calculate whether to line-wrap the text of an item. Since You should also make sure to update the tests that failed on travis. |
Yep, will do, but I would like to get feedback first. If people don't want this, I don't want to spend more time on it 😛 |
I'm not a big fan either... It doesn't "fit" in whole layout. |
I wonder if we could achieve the same effect with syntax highlighting? |
One other thing is that since the names of the functions are aligned, I find them easier to glance through. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #58578) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Since the feedback seems to be negative, I'm going to go ahead a close this. Thanks anyway :) |
My goal was to make it easier to see what qualifiers are added to a method.
What do people think? Is this an improvement?
r? @QuietMisdreavus
Sample screenshots: