Skip to content

ManuallyDrop != MaybeUninit #58780

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2019
Merged

ManuallyDrop != MaybeUninit #58780

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2019

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 27, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Feb 27, 2019

r? @nagisa

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nagisa and unassigned withoutboats Feb 27, 2019
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 27, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 27, 2019

📌 Commit f92c204 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 27, 2019
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 27, 2019

@bors rollup

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Feb 28, 2019

Failed in #58798 (comment), @bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 28, 2019
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented Feb 28, 2019

@rust-lang/infra Why did the PR CI not catch that?

Co-Authored-By: RalfJung <post@ralfj.de>
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Feb 28, 2019

@bors r=nagisa

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2019

📌 Commit 0c1a38c has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 28, 2019
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2019
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2019
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2019
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #58730 (Have all methods of Filter and FilterMap use internal iteration)
 - #58780 (ManuallyDrop != MaybeUninit)
 - #58782 (Replace `s` with `self` in docs for str methods taking self.)
 - #58785 (allow specifying attributes for tool lints)
 - #58802 (Ensure `record_layout_for_printing()` is inlined.)
 - #58821 (Fixed a syntax error in the pin docs)
 - #58830 (tidy: deny(rust_2018_idioms))
 - #58832 (Revert switching to GCP on AppVeyor)
 - #58833 (tools/rustbook: deny(rust_2018_idioms))
 - #58835 (tools/remote-test-{client,server}: deny(rust_2018_idioms))
 - #58838 (Fix typo in Vec#resize_with documentation)
 - #58842 (Forbid duplicating Cargo as a dependency)
 - #58852 (Update toolchain to build NetBSD release)
 - #58865 (Fix C-variadic function printing)
@bors bors merged commit 0c1a38c into rust-lang:master Mar 3, 2019
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the manually-drop branch June 10, 2019 11:04
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants