Skip to content

Reduces Code Repetitions like !n >> amt #59101

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019

Conversation

kenta7777
Copy link
Contributor

@kenta7777 kenta7777 commented Mar 11, 2019

Fixes #49937 .
This PR contains defining a function which operates bit inversion and reducing bit operation like !0u128 >> (128 - size.bits()).

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 11, 2019
@kenta7777 kenta7777 changed the title Reduce Code epetition Reduce Code Repetition Mar 11, 2019
@kenta7777 kenta7777 changed the title Reduce Code Repetition Reduces Code Repetitions like !n >> amt Mar 11, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 11, 2019

r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned oli-obk and unassigned pnkfelix Mar 11, 2019
@@ -115,14 +116,14 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
ty::Int(ity) => {
// FIXME(49937): refactor these bit manipulations into interpret.
let size = Integer::from_attr(&tcx, SignedInt(ity)).size();
let max = !0u128 >> (128 - size.bits());
let max = mask(size);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this could be truncate(u128::max_value(), size)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your review. Then, should I replace mask with truncate and remove the definition of mask?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, I think that's for the best, unless you see a lot of other sites in the compiler where using mask would make sense.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 11, 2019

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 11, 2019

📌 Commit 18b40c6 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 11, 2019
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 11, 2019

@bors rollup

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2019
…=oli-obk

Reduces Code Repetitions like `!n >> amt`

Fixes rust-lang#49937 .
This PR contains defining a function which operates bit inversion and reducing bit operation like `!0u128 >> (128 - size.bits())`.
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2019
…=oli-obk

Reduces Code Repetitions like `!n >> amt`

Fixes rust-lang#49937 .
This PR contains defining a function which operates bit inversion and reducing bit operation like `!0u128 >> (128 - size.bits())`.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2019
…=oli-obk

Reduces Code Repetitions like `!n >> amt`

Fixes rust-lang#49937 .
This PR contains defining a function which operates bit inversion and reducing bit operation like `!0u128 >> (128 - size.bits())`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2019
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #58829 (librustc_interface: Update scoped-tls to 1.0)
 - #58876 (Parse lifetimes that start with a number and give specific error)
 - #58908 (Update rand version)
 - #58998 (Fix documentation of from_ne_bytes and from_le_bytes)
 - #59056 (Use lifetime contravariance to elide more lifetimes in core+alloc+std)
 - #59057 (Standardize `Range*` documentation)
 - #59080 (Fix incorrect links in librustc_codegen_llvm documentation)
 - #59083 (Fix #54822 and associated faulty tests)
 - #59093 (Remove precompute_in_scope_traits_hashes)
 - #59101 (Reduces Code Repetitions like `!n >> amt`)
 - #59121 (impl FromIterator for Result: Use assert_eq! instead of assert!)
 - #59124 (Replace assert with assert_eq)
 - #59129 (Visit impl Trait for dead_code lint)
 - #59130 (Note that NonNull does not launder shared references for mutation)
 - #59132 (ignore higher-ranked object bound conditions created by WF)
 - #59138 (Simplify Iterator::{min, max})

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 18b40c6 into rust-lang:master Mar 13, 2019
@kenta7777
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

@kenta7777 kenta7777 deleted the reduce-code-repetition branch March 13, 2019 06:38
@@ -115,14 +116,14 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
ty::Int(ity) => {
// FIXME(49937): refactor these bit manipulations into interpret.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These FIXMEs look resolved now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for reporting. I forgot to remove this comment out.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think let bias = 1u128 << (size.bits() - 1); is not resolved.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants