-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Clarify semantics of mem::zeroed #63215
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
r? @dtolnay (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy with this but let's give @Centril a chance to react, too.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I had one job...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, except for the nit.
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 3725e35 has been approved by |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #63107 (Added support for armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi/musleabi) - #63121 (On `format!()` arg count mismatch provide extra info) - #63196 (build_helper: try less confusing method names) - #63206 (remove unsupported test case) - #63208 (Round generator sizes to a multiple of their alignment) - #63212 (Pretty print attributes in `print_arg`) - #63215 (Clarify semantics of mem::zeroed) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Clarifies the semantics of
mem::zeroed
.r? @Centril
cc @RalfJung