Skip to content

Refactor macro by example #64689

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 25, 2019
Merged

Refactor macro by example #64689

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 25, 2019

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Sep 22, 2019

This doesn't do anything useful yet, and just moves code around and restricts visibility

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 22, 2019
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 22, 2019
@matklad
Copy link
Member Author

matklad commented Sep 22, 2019

fxed!

@rustbot modify labels: -S-waiting-on-author, +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 22, 2019
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 22, 2019

📌 Commit 81fe857 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 22, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2019
Refactor macro by example

This doesn't do anything useful yet, and just moves code around and restricts visibility
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
Refactor macro by example

This doesn't do anything useful yet, and just moves code around and restricts visibility
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
Refactor macro by example

This doesn't do anything useful yet, and just moves code around and restricts visibility
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #63356 (Issue#63183: Add fs::read_dir() and ReadDir warning about iterator order + example)
 - #63934 (Fix coherence checking for impl trait in type aliases)
 - #64016 (Streamline `Compiler`)
 - #64296 (Document the unstable iter_order_by library feature)
 - #64443 (rustdoc: general cleanup)
 - #64622 (Add a cycle detector for generic `Graph`s and `mir::Body`s)
 - #64689 (Refactor macro by example)
 - #64698 (Recover on `const X = 42;` and infer type + Error Stash API)
 - #64702 (Remove unused dependencies)
 - #64717 (update mem::discriminant test to use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators)
 - #64720 ( remove rtp.rs, and move rtpSpawn and RTP_ID_ERROR to libc)
 - #64721 (Fixed issue from #64447)
 - #64725 (fix one typo)
 - #64737 (fix several issues in String docs)
 - #64742 (relnotes: make compatibility section more sterile and fix rustc version)
 - #64748 (Fix #64744. Account for the Zero sub-pattern case.)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 81fe857 into rust-lang:master Sep 25, 2019
@matklad matklad deleted the refactor-mbe branch September 25, 2019 06:49
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants