Skip to content

Remove unused read_uleb128 parameter. #68661

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2020

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

@nnethercote nnethercote commented Jan 30, 2020

No description provided.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 30, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2020

📌 Commit 6961db2 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 30, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 6961db2 with merge 212b2c7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2020
…rk-Simulacrum

Remove unused `read_uleb128` parameter.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 212b2c7 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 30, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 6961db2 into rust-lang:master Jan 30, 2020
@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the rm-unused-read_uleb128-param branch January 31, 2020 04:14
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants