Skip to content

Clean up E0263 explanation #68777

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2020
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 3, 2020

📌 Commit 019ca55 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 3, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #68678 (Install robots.txt into rust-docs tarballs)
 - #68711 (Added upper bound of what vecs and boxes can allocate)
 - #68744 (Do not ICE in `type-alias-impl-trait` with save-analysis)
 - #68777 (Clean up E0263 explanation)
 - #68787 (Optimize core::ptr::align_offset (part 1))
 - #68797 (Fix links to types instead of modules)
 - #68798 (Test that `#[track_caller]` as `fn()` respects RT / CTFE equivalence)
 - #68800 (Stabilize `core::iter::once_with()`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 019ca55 into rust-lang:master Feb 3, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the clean-up-e0263 branch February 4, 2020 09:20
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants