Skip to content

Tweak output for invalid negative impl errors #69649

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2020

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@estebank estebank commented Mar 2, 2020

Follow up to #69722. Tweak negative impl errors emitted in the HIR:

error[E0192]: invalid negative impl
  --> $DIR/E0192.rs:9:6
   |
LL | impl !Trait for Foo { }
   |      ^^^^^^
   |
   = note: negative impls are only allowed for auto traits, like `Send` and `Sync`

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @ecstatic-morse

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 2, 2020
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 3, 2020

r? @Centril

High level reviewing notes before doing a deeper review:

  • Let's split this PR into two parts, one for AST and one for HIR -- I would like to review the HIR parts in isolation as well as making sure that they don't regress perf.
  • Please avoid changing random_field: _s in favor of .. when pattern matching records, especially when it comes to visitors. The use of random_field: _ is typically intentional to make sure that we are forced to handle new cases should we add more fields.
  • Please also add a PR description.

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

estebank commented Mar 5, 2020

AST part in #69722

@Centril Centril added S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 8, 2020
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@Dylan-DPC-zz

This comment has been minimized.

@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Mar 21, 2020
@estebank estebank force-pushed the negative-impl-span branch from 65de63b to 19d0186 Compare March 23, 2020 00:56
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Centril rebased on top of master and this PR only has the HIR changes.

@estebank estebank added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 23, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me with these comments addressed and clean perf.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 23, 2020

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

⌛ Trying commit 19d0186f3cead8ed2cc3741f6c2e2fbb180e81d2 with merge 12e42227516ca02418f6dbea278da1e4c0dd14b3...

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 23, 2020
@estebank estebank force-pushed the negative-impl-span branch from 19d0186 to b8f9866 Compare March 23, 2020 04:53
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

⌛ Trying commit b8f9866 with merge a7111c6f0c00e55b69e1eb62c1f04775705b4e0e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

☀️ Try build successful - checks-azure
Build commit: a7111c6f0c00e55b69e1eb62c1f04775705b4e0e (a7111c6f0c00e55b69e1eb62c1f04775705b4e0e)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued a7111c6f0c00e55b69e1eb62c1f04775705b4e0e with parent e4b01c7, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit a7111c6f0c00e55b69e1eb62c1f04775705b4e0e, comparison URL.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 23, 2020

Seems like noise, @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

📌 Commit b8f9866 has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 23, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

⌛ Testing commit b8f9866 with merge 8549cfe...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: Centril
Pushing 8549cfe to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 23, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 8549cfe into rust-lang:master Mar 23, 2020
@estebank estebank deleted the negative-impl-span branch November 9, 2023 05:17
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants