Skip to content

Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators. #69656

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2020

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 3, 2020
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

It seems slightly worse for readability but may be faster to compile and run.

Need a second opinion, reassigning to the first person from GitHub reviewer suggestions.
r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned oli-obk and unassigned petrochenkov Mar 3, 2020
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 3, 2020

Does this have a clippy lint? Or was this a manual thing?

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 3, 2020

@bors r+

Please post this info on future PRs

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 3, 2020

📌 Commit d3e5177 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 3, 2020
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

matthiaskrgr commented Mar 3, 2020

Eh, so far I've often given the branch the name of the lint :P

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 3, 2020

XD sure, I still think it'll be easier for someone who comes back to these via git blame will have it easier if the commit message contains a link or an explanation for the change

Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2020
Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #69656 (Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators.)
 - #69674 (Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method )
 - #69676 (Pass correct place to `discriminant_switch_effect`)
 - #69706 (Use subslice patterns in slice methods)
 - #69714 (Make PlaceRef take just one lifetime)
 - #69727 (Avoid using `unwrap()` in suggestions)

Failed merges:

 - #69589 (ast: `Mac`/`Macro` -> `MacCall`)
 - #69680 (rustc_expand: Factor out `Annotatable::into_tokens` to a separate method)

r? @ghost
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2020
Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2020
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67741 (When encountering an Item in a pat context, point at the item def)
 - #68985 (Parse & reject postfix operators after casts)
 - #69656 (Use .next() instead of .nth(0) on iterators.)
 - #69680 (rustc_expand: Factor out `Annotatable::into_tokens` to a separate method)
 - #69690 (test(pattern): add tests for combinations of pattern features)
 - #69706 (Use subslice patterns in slice methods)
 - #69727 (Avoid using `unwrap()` in suggestions)
 - #69754 (Update deprecation version to 1.42 for Error::description)
 - #69782 (Don't redundantly repeat field names (clippy::redundant_field_names))

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 5d1433b into rust-lang:master Mar 7, 2020
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the iter_nth_zero branch January 25, 2025 09:12
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants