Skip to content

Rollup of 9 pull requests #70295

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 31 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Mar 23, 2020

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

withoutboats and others added 30 commits January 31, 2020 14:26
Currently, constructing a waker requires calling the unsafe
`Waker::from_raw` API. This API requires the user to manually construct
a vtable for the waker themself - which is both cumbersome and very
error prone. This API would provide an ergonomic, straightforward and
guaranteed memory-safe way of constructing a waker.

It has been our longstanding intention that the `Waker` type essentially
function as an `Arc<dyn Wake>`, with a `Wake` trait as defined here. Two
considerations prevented the original API from being shipped as simply
an `Arc<dyn Wake>`:

- We want to support futures on embedded systems, which may not have an
  allocator, and in optimized executors for which this API may not be
  best-suited. Therefore, we have always explicitly supported the
  maximally-flexible (but also memory-unsafe) `RawWaker` API, and
  `Waker` has always lived in libcore.
- Because `Waker` lives in libcore and `Arc` lives in liballoc, it has
  not been feasible to provide a constructor for `Waker` from `Arc<dyn
  Wake>`.

Therefore, the Wake trait was left out of the initial version of the
task waker API.

However, as Rust 1.41, it is possible under the more flexible orphan
rules to implement `From<Arc<W>> for Waker where W: Wake` in liballoc.
Therefore, we can now define this constructor even though `Waker` lives
in libcore.

This PR adds these APIs:

- A `Wake` trait, which contains two methods
    - A required method `wake`, which is called by `Waker::wake`
    - A provided method `wake_by_ref`, which is called by
      `Waker::wake_by_ref` and which implementors can override if they
      can optimize this use case.
- An implementation of `From<Arc<W>> for Waker where W: Wake + Send +
  Sync + 'static`
- A similar implementation of `From<Arc<W>> for RawWaker`.
The codegen implementation already works for this, so we're:

* propagating track_caller attr from trait def to impl
* relaxing errors
* adding tests

Approved in a recent lang team meeting:
https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/blob/master/minutes/2020-01-09.md
We can do this now that opt_associated_item doesn't have any panicking paths.
Co-Authored-By: Ashley Mannix <ashleymannix@live.com.au>
Co-Authored-By: Ashley Mannix <ashleymannix@live.com.au>
Co-Authored-By: Ashley Mannix <ashleymannix@live.com.au>
…oats

Add Wake trait for safe construction of Wakers.

Currently, constructing a waker requires calling the unsafe `Waker::from_raw` API. This API requires the user to manually construct a vtable for the waker themself - which is both cumbersome and very error prone. This API would provide an ergonomic, straightforward and guaranteed memory-safe way of constructing a waker.

It has been our longstanding intention that the `Waker` type essentially function as an `Arc<dyn Wake>`, with a `Wake` trait as defined here. Two considerations prevented the original API from being shipped as simply an `Arc<dyn Wake>`:

- We want to support futures on embedded systems, which may not have an allocator, and in optimized executors for which this API may not be best-suited. Therefore, we have always explicitly supported the maximally-flexible (but also memory-unsafe) `RawWaker` API, and `Waker` has always lived in libcore.
- Because `Waker` lives in libcore and `Arc` lives in liballoc, it has not been feasible to provide a constructor for `Waker` from `Arc<dyn Wake>`.

Therefore, the Wake trait was left out of the initial version of the task waker API.

However, as Rust 1.41, it is possible under the more flexible orphan rules to implement `From<Arc<W>> for Waker where W: Wake` in liballoc. Therefore, we can now define this constructor even though `Waker` lives in libcore.

This PR adds these APIs:

- A `Wake` trait, which contains two methods
    - A required method `wake`, which is called by `Waker::wake`
    - A provided method `wake_by_ref`, which is called by `Waker::wake_by_ref` and which implementors can override if they can optimize this use case.
- An implementation of `From<Arc<W>> for Waker where W: Wake + Send + Sync + 'static`
- A similar implementation of `From<Arc<W>> for RawWaker`.
#[track_caller] in traits

Per rust-lang#47809 (comment), this allows the `#[track_caller]` attribute on trait methods.

Includes tests for `#[track_caller]` with:

* "regular" trait impls
* default trait impls
* "blanket-tracked" trait impls, where the annotation is in the trait definition and is inherited by "regular" impls of the trait
Only display definition when suggesting a typo

Closes rust-lang#70206
r? @Centril
…-morse

resolve: Avoid "self-confirming" import resolutions in one more case

So the idea behind "blacklisted bindings" is that we must ignore some name definitions during resolution because otherwise they cause infinite cycles.
E.g. import
```rust
use my_crate;
```
would refer to itself (on 2018 edition) without this blacklisting, because `use my_crate;` is the first name in scope when we are resolving `my_crate` here.

In this PR we are doing this blacklisting for the case
```rust
use same::same;
```
, namely blacklisting the second `same` when resolving the first `same`.
This was previously forgotten.

Fixes rust-lang#62767
handle ConstKind::Unresolved after monomorphizing

fixes rust-lang#70125

r? @bjorn3
…an-DPC

remove redundant closures (clippy::redundant_closure)
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Mar 23, 2020

@bors r+ p=9 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

📌 Commit 6d4025b has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 23, 2020
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 23, 2020
@Centril Centril closed this Mar 23, 2020
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup-0psabg1 branch March 23, 2020 03:24
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants