Skip to content

Adjust cfg(version) to lang team decision #72001

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2020

Conversation

mibac138
Copy link
Contributor

@mibac138 mibac138 commented May 8, 2020

See #64796 (comment) for details

r? @petrochenkov who reviewed the original PR (#71314)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 8, 2020
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 8, 2020

📌 Commit cd291b8 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 8, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 8, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#71989 (Use a single enum for the kind of a const context)
 - rust-lang#71993 (Remove old `util/liveness.rs` module)
 - rust-lang#71999 (Add myself to mailmap.)
 - rust-lang#72001 (Adjust cfg(version) to lang team decision)
 - rust-lang#72007 (Fix some tests failing in `--pass check` mode)
 - rust-lang#72008 (Add const-generics test)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 5cef212 into rust-lang:master May 8, 2020
@mibac138 mibac138 deleted the cfg-version branch May 8, 2020 16:42
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants