-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map #73023
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map #73023
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @davidtwco Sorry to bother you again. Can you please review and approve this PR? |
@Dylan-DPC @lzutao @lcnr I have raised new PR and closed #72947. Please take a look. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 👍
Please add fixes #72642
to the description of this PR.
This automatically closes that issue once this PR is merged.
edit: what was the reason for closing the original PR?
Will r+ once CI passes! |
@lcnr I did something wrong while squashing the commit. That's why I raised fresh PR. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 9d1a883 has been approved by |
…tion, r=davidtwco Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map rust-lang#72642 fixes rust-lang#72642
…tion, r=davidtwco Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map rust-lang#72642 fixes rust-lang#72642
7edbb63
to
b786296
Compare
@Dylan-DPC Please let me know if anything is pending from my side. I rebased my PR with the master branch. CI pipeline is working fine. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit b7862969bf3671b767693d8f31d58424c6592d91 has been approved by |
Fixed failing test-cases Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map rust-lang#72642 Fixed failing test-cases
b786296
to
b055552
Compare
@Dylan-DPC Please let me know if there is anything stopping this PR to be merged in master. This PR has been approved by the reviewer @davidtwco . I have been rebasing with master on daily basis and CI pipeline is also green. Please let me know if there is anything pending from my side. I would address it asap. |
@ayushmishra2005 Unless there are conflicts or CI failures while merging, you don’t need to rebase - every time you do, I need to reapprove. It’s in the merge queue. @bors r+ |
📌 Commit b055552 has been approved by |
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72706 (Add windows group to triagebot) - rust-lang#72789 (resolve: Do not suggest imports from the same module in which we are resolving) - rust-lang#72890 (improper ctypes: normalize return types and transparent structs) - rust-lang#72897 (normalize adt fields during structural match checking) - rust-lang#73005 (Don't create impl candidates when obligation contains errors) - rust-lang#73023 (Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map ) - rust-lang#73070 (Add regression test for const generic ICE in rust-lang#72819) - rust-lang#73157 (Don't lose empty `where` clause when pretty-printing) - rust-lang#73184 (Reoder order in which MinGW libs are linked to fix recent breakage) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map #72642
fixes #72642