-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
deprecate wrapping_offset_from #73580
deprecate wrapping_offset_from #73580
Conversation
cc @scottmcm who originally mused whether we want a |
cebf727
to
467415d
Compare
r=me assuming no objections. |
@rust-lang/libs any objections to this deprecation of the unstable method
|
I see a 👍 from sfackler so with three of us I think this is good to go. |
📌 Commit 467415d has been approved by |
@bors rollup |
…from, r=Amanieu deprecate wrapping_offset_from As per rust-lang#41079 (comment) which seems like a consensus. r? @Amanieu
…from, r=Amanieu deprecate wrapping_offset_from As per rust-lang#41079 (comment) which seems like a consensus. r? @Amanieu
…from, r=Amanieu deprecate wrapping_offset_from As per rust-lang#41079 (comment) which seems like a consensus. r? @Amanieu
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#71660 (impl PartialEq<Vec<B>> for &[A], &mut [A]) - rust-lang#72623 (Prefer accessible paths in 'use' suggestions) - rust-lang#73502 (Add E0765) - rust-lang#73580 (deprecate wrapping_offset_from) - rust-lang#73582 (Miri: replace many bug! by span_bug!) - rust-lang#73585 (Do not send a notification for P-high stable regressions) Failed merges: - rust-lang#73581 (Create 0766 error code) r? @ghost
Thanks for the ping here, @oli-obk. My recollection is that that musing was from way back when the only method was the safe one (https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.22.0/std/primitive.pointer.html#method.offset_to), and I thought that there should probably be an unsafe one. I have no attachment to the safe one, and am fine with its removal. |
`wrapping_offset_from` was deprecated by <rust-lang/rust#73580>.
As per #41079 (comment) which seems like a consensus.
r? @Amanieu