Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

older toolchains not valid anymore #74521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

older toolchains not valid anymore #74521

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2020

Conversation

andjo403
Copy link
Contributor

with the change to llvm 10 the parameter
LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN do not do anything as min and soft error is the same.
see https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project/blob/86b120e6f302d39cd6973b6391fb299d7bc22122/llvm/cmake/modules/CheckCompilerVersion.cmake

with the change to llvm 10 the parameter
LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN do not do any thing as
min and soft error is the same.
see https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project/blob/86b120e6f302d39cd6973b6391fb299d7bc22122/llvm/cmake/modules/CheckCompilerVersion.cmake
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 19, 2020
@Muirrum Muirrum added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 6, 2020
Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

r? @Mark-Simulacrum and cc @nikic as you're familiar with LLVM and left a comment in #63630.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r? @nikic or @cuviper

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 11, 2020

@bors r+ rollup=always

The allow-old-toolchain config.toml option still exists in case this becomes relevant again in the future, but there's no reason to have prominent documentation in README for it.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 11, 2020

📌 Commit 30659cd has been approved by nikic

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 11, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2020
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#74521 (older toolchains not valid anymore)
 - rust-lang#74960 (Fix regionck failure when converting Index to IndexMut)
 - rust-lang#75234 (Update asm! documentation in unstable book)
 - rust-lang#75368 (Move to doc links inside the prelude)
 - rust-lang#75371 (Move to doc links inside std/time.rs)
 - rust-lang#75394 (Add a function to `TyCtxt` for computing an `Allocation` for a `static` item's initializer)
 - rust-lang#75395 (Switch to intra-doc links in library/std/src/os/*/fs.rs)
 - rust-lang#75422 (Accept more safety comments)
 - rust-lang#75424 (fix wrong word in documentation)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 7e503a0 into rust-lang:master Aug 12, 2020
@andjo403 andjo403 deleted the readme branch February 28, 2021 09:28
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants